Conflict Blotter

News, analysis and original reporting from the Middle East

Conflict Blotter header image 2

Israel’s borders heat up

September 6th, 2007 · 5 Comments

Ever since spring we’ve been hearing in the local media and elsewhere that Israeli intelligence and military officials thought the summer of 2007 would be eventful. They warned of war with Syria, or a round two with Hezbollah, or with a shodown with Hamas in Gaza. But the summer just ticked on quietly. The alarmists seemed mistaken.

Suddenly, however, Israel’s northern border with Syria and its southern border with Gaza have both heated up. Ever since a Qassam rocket struck a nursery school in Sderot the pressure on the government to act has been increasing. Though today’s incursion into southern Gaza appears at this early stage to be limited in scope, and though the Security Cabinet has decided on restraint for the time being, it is looking increasingly like an eventual full scale invasion of the Gaza Strip is a foregone conclusion. The first time a Qassam rocket causes any sort of significant casualties, which will happen one of these days, the government is going to find the public outcry leaves it little choice but to drastically escalate its military response.

Haaretz is reporting that one of the decisive arguments for restraint within the Israeli security establishment is the rising tensions with the Syrians and the wish to avoid a conflict on two fronts. The Syrians alleged today that Israel may have bombed undisclosed targets in the northeast of the country last night. The Syrian Arab News Agency actually referred to an “ammo drop” instead of an air strike. I guess a fighter jet may jettison ammo, without hostile intent, if it needs to shed weight for whatever reason, to keep it aloft or to increase its maneuverability. The Israeli Air Force, which is reportedly in the middle of a large exercise, often trains in Turkish air space not far from the Syrian border.
Tensions have been high all summer between Israel and Syria. Last night’s alleged incident, if it turns out to be true, is precisely the scenario — in which an Israeli exercise is misinterpreted by the Syrians and causes a chain reaction that leads to war — that analysts have been warning about for months.

UPDATE: The more I think about it, it seems that the Syrians decision to dub it an “ammo drop” rather than an air strike is an indication that the Syrians are intent on deescalating and downplaying whatever actually happened last night. The Israelis, by refusing to confirm or comment on the incident, are playing along, and thus also helping to defuse what could have been a prickly situation.

Tags: Syria · Israel

5 responses so far ↓

  • 1 ns // Sep 6, 2007 at 7:27 pm

    There won’t be a full scale invasion of gaza to elimintate qassam fire. Maybe incursions in the north and south, but it makes no strategic sense to fully invade Gaza for that reason. You need bombers in Jerusalem for that.

  • 2 AR // Sep 7, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    I don’t think it was an exercise. The Turkish newspapers are reporting that the last Israeli exercise was in August. From all the different newspaper reports from the region, which may be wrong, it looks like Israeli air forces pentrated deep into Syria. This leads me a few conclusions 1) The Israeli military wanted to see the strengths and weakness of the Syrian air defenses that they have recieved from Russia. 2) This was a decoy. The Israeli military wants Iran to think that it will attack and bomb their facilities from this direction, fueling in . or 3) The Israeli military is doing psy-ops

  • 3 Eamonn McDonagh // Sep 7, 2007 at 7:21 pm

    there’s a piece here that suggests it was accidentally on purpose

    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3447004,00.html

  • 4 Kebz // Sep 8, 2007 at 4:09 pm

    Rocket firing is just an excuse used by Israel as a pretext for further bombings. Israel routinely kills people inside Gaza for no other reason than that they entered into a two mile wide buffer zone inside Gaza knowingly or unknowingly. Why should they die for travelling in their own territory? Is it any wonder that some of them resort to rocket firing? Reporting the situation simply as Iraeli response to Qassam fire is dishonest and lazy. Both sides are to blame with the majority share on the Israeli side.

  • 5 Bully // Sep 9, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    I go along with the assumption that this incident was a test of the new Anti-aircraft equipment Syria (and Iran) have bought from Russia.

    http://debka.com/article.php?aid=1301

    Whereas the tone of the article is quite biased, the details given are rather interesting (I just wondered, if Syria hasn’t received TOR-M1 SAMs or if the IDF didn’t want to put them on test either).

Leave a Comment